As Congress, to its credit, calls what is going on in Sudan
to be Genocide Against African Christians, The Largest Boycott in History
is required to make the following demand.
It is a
demand that rewards Congress and the nation.
The Plan allows all 535 members of Congress to forevermore each speak
directly to the American people without a media corps setting up a screen
to prevent communication.
The plan provides a dignified mea
culpa for Members of the boards of directors of the television network
parent corporations:
A great, enjoyable demand that stands to cause all 535
Members of Congress to be daily supporters of
The Largest Boycott In History
The Largest Boycott in History requires that
(1) GE-NBC-MS [Microsoft] NBC/CNBC, (2)
Viacom-CBS, (3) Disney-ABC and (4) Time Warner-CNN and News Corp./Fox News
and (6) EchoStar and DirecTV create three new television channels:
The three
new television channels
- The Democratic Party Television
Channel,
- The Republican Party Television
Channel.
- And the Congressional Access System
TV Channel.
The first two channels are given
to the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee
to do with what they want, 24/7. Including raise money.
These are must-carry channels. It is a demand by The
Largest Boycott in History.
The
demand includes a yet-to-be-selected start-date-certain – with
million dollar per week late-penalties from each television network parent
corporation.
Note to Members of Congress:
Obtain the three new channels by simply
contacting black leaders and asking them to send The Historic Letter.
Is a ‘demand’ necessary? Let the television network
parent corporation board members respond. The source of the demand is
Congress’ assertion that there is Genocide going on against Protestants
and Catholics in Sudan - combined with national media silence about it.
The Congressional Access Allocation System TV Channel gives each
and every member of Congress (and all living former U.S. presidents) –
in unchanging alphabetical order forever - a 15-minute ‘say or show
anything from anywhere on earth’ television segment, every 5.6
days, every 22.3 days in the 6:00 p.m. to midnight period.
It is a de facto, autonomous "60 Minutes" segment.
The member of Congress alone chooses the topic and presentation.
(The arithmetic: the 535 members of Congress divided by the ninety-six
15-minute segments in each 24 hours = 5.57.
And 535 divided by the 24 segments in the 6 p.m. to 12 p.m. segments =
22.29 ).
Potluck sponsorship pays equal production costs for each
congressperson.
Is a boycott really required to create this channel? If so, why?
The Congressional Access Allocation System TV Channel is
a major, pleasing, new addition to liberal democracy. It stands to be
emulated in other nations.
In American public life to date, there has not been any public
affairs proposal that is supported by all 535 members of Congress. Until
this one.
Consider how the Congressional Black Caucus would very
much like the Congressional Access Allocation System TV Channel.
Genocide against black Christians in Sudan would have
been a huge national and world issue, not a non-issue….
This demand is of enormous advantage to
(1) GE-NBC-MS [Microsoft]
NBC/CNBC, (2) Viacom-CBS, (3) Disney-ABC and (4) Time Warner-CNN and News
Corp./Fox News.
The Members of the boards of directors can say, ‘Wish
we’d thought of it.’
This demand by The Largest Boycott in History creates a
strategic triple-pincers on the news divisions and reporters who are too
busy (after all, a guy killed his wife in Fresno) to report on:
1. Genocide Against Christians in Sudan and,
2. The daily violent anti-Semitic events in Europe.
The triple pincers:
1. The Largest Boycott in History itself, and,
2. The United States Congress, and,
3. The Members of the boards of directors of the parent corporations of
the television networks.
Top
Historically, there is no social instrument more powerful than a major
boycott
In all of these regards, as you would know, there is no social instrument
more powerful than a major boycott. Only a nation-state is more powerful
than a major boycott.
The British Empire was twice brought down by major boycotts, that of the
U.S. Colonials and the boycotts of British goods by India.
A stern, intellectually convinced, and angry government is often powerless
before a major boycott. For example, the great Montgomery Bus Boycott.
There is no example in history of a corporation not giving in to a major
boycott.
They always surrender. There is no issue here of which side will win.
Very few endeavors in life are a slam dunk. An accusation of media silence
about (1) Genocide Against Christians in Sudan, and about (2) an
unacceptable media silence about the new violent and intimidating
anti-Semitism in Europe, to lead to surrender by the television networks,
may be seen as a slam-dunk. What do you think?
The Members of the Boards of Directors of (1) GE-NBC-MS [Microsoft]
NBC/CNBC, (2) Viacom-CBS, (3) Disney-ABC and (4) Time Warner-CNN and News
Corp./Fox News support the goals of The Largest Boycott in History.
They will cut adrift their reporters, as they must.
There is no one standing in the doorway with arms folded and saying Never.
Top
___________________________
Other Substantial Benefits to the Nation and for Congress
The plan for the Enabling Act for SportsBOND/Federal Beneficial Sports
Wagering Commission, Inc.™ is seen at >
SportsBOND/The Federal Beneficial Sports Wagering
Commission, Inc.
calls for Federal Beneficial to build:
C. 535 $1 Billion Dollar Perpetual Trusts, that is, 535 trusts, for the
use of each member of Congress for Any Good Works in his or her district,
and,
D. To build 535 Our Home District’s Residence, a permanent residence in
Washington, D.C., for each Congressional District office, ‘owned by the
people.’
Each Our Home District’s Residence would include a minimum of, say, six
acres – to allow July 4th garden parties and such for the constituents.
If the 535 Congressional spouses happen to approve of the plan. What if
they say no? We’re sunk.
Top
_________________________________
Demand for Nationally-televised U.S. Congressional Hearings
The Largest Boycott in History offers to Congress its demand to the
television networks that they offer to televise U.S. Congressional
Hearings on the topic of National Media Silence about:
A. What the United States Congress itself calls Genocide Against
Christians in Sudan, and,
B. The virtual silence about the new, violent anti-Semitism in Europe,
a slow-motion-Kristallnacht building up.
The boards of directors will separate themselves from the News
Departments, which latter are going down for the count.
Top
